Stunning New Kaavya Revelations

In a shocking, exclusive expose, The Harvard Scarlet & Mauve revealed that Kaavya Viswanathan has not plagiarised from any of these books: Lolita, Thomas the Tank Engine, The Ruhnama, Gulliver’s Travels or, indeed, the classic text Chemistry: A Practical Handbook.
Initially her publishers said that the omissions would be corrected in a second, more inclusive edition of the book, until a journalist pointed out that Opal Mehta had been officially pulled from bookstores. A representative of the New York book packaging agency, however, said that the lack of unconscious borrowings across several prominent literary genres was regrettable, and that it might be rectified–but by another author. She refused to confirm that the agency had its eye on a young Columbia sophomore this time, but admitted that discussions had stalled “for technical reasons”. “We have worked out the packaging fees successfully,” she said, “but there’s an additional charge for author giftwrapping, and we hope to work that out amicably.”
Meanwhile, the estate of the late Barbara Cartland said it was considering suing the young and unfortunately discredited genius. “Dame Cartland was the pioneer of romantic fiction; you might even call her the Mother of Chick Lit. We are disappointed, dismayed and distressed to see that this young author did not internalise a single line of her work: not even a few ellipses…” said a legal representative.

Coming up: “Kaavya stole my name!” cries Ruby Mehtab. But is Ruby truly the original for Opal Mehta… or does that distinction belong to–Pearl Mehra? Find out in further episodes of the KV saga, sponsored by Cryptomnesia Inc.

And courtesy The New York Times, a look at how closely J Kenney’s The Great Gatsby might resemble The Great Gatsby:

MR. KING Are there similarities between your new novel, “The Great Gatsby” and “The Great Gatsby” by F. Scott Fitzgerald?

MR. KENNEY Not so much “similarities.” They’re actually identical.

MR. KING I see.

MR. KENNEY Except for my name as author…





3 responses to “Stunning New Kaavya Revelations”

  1. reno Avatar

    Hello from Belgium !!Kind regards.Renaud

  2. Illogical Truisms Avatar

    hehe, are you saying it was okay for her to plagiarise?

  3. Hurree Avatar

    Hello from Belgaum, Hello From Belgium, pleased to meetcha.Illogical, welcome and here’s a hint. This was a post entirely devoid of morality, moral value, moral substance, moral science or A Moral whatsoever. It’s just a light dig at the media revelations, which does not make it okay for young KV to treat a book as if it’s a homework assignment she’s Googling. In brief, this was merely an amoral post; not an immoral post.(An immoral post would have pointed out that if KV had stolen from heaps of writers–one per paragraph–then she could have called her work a daring, defiant pastiche spitting at the notion of originality emerging from a genre riddled with cliches, a darkly ironic commentary on the meaninglessness of it all, etc. But of course we didn’t make that point, because we aren’t that kind of post.)Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: